Competency of Kate Steinles alleged killer being reviewed by federal judge

The competency of a defendant in a 2015 homicide case that figured prominently in Donald Trumps run for president is being reviewed by a federal judge, according to a report.

Illegal immigrant Jose Ines Garcia Zarate of Mexico is facing federal gun charges in the shooting death of Kate Steinle, 32, who authorities say was struck by gunfire when she visited a crowded pier in San Francisco.

In part because Zarate was a convicted felon and had previously been deported from the U.S. five times, the case sparked a national debate about so-called sanctuary cities such as San Francisco, and other aspects of U.S. immigration policies.

Defense attorneys for Zarate have claimed he found the gun and fired it accidentally. He stood trial in 2017 on charges that included murder but a San Francisco Superior Court jury acquitted him of all charges except being a felon in possession of a firearm, The Associated Press reported.


That conviction, however, was later overturned by an appeals court, the report said.

When the initial verdict was announced, Trump who was nearing the end of his first year as president called the jurys decision disgraceful.

San Francisco shooting suspect Jose Ines Garcia Zarate and victim Kathryn Steinle are shown in this composite photo. (Associated Press)

No wonder the people of our Country are so angry with illegal immigration, the president wrote at the time.

Zarate has been in custody since July 1, 2015, the day of the shooting, and has been awaiting a new trial on the weapons charge. But the case is pending because in January, U.S. District Court Judge Vince Chhabria expressed serious concerns about the defendants mental status, the AP reported.

Two doctors have diagnosed Zarate as being schizophrenic and declared him unfit to stand trial, claiming he is unable to follow court proceedings.

Zarate reportedly wanted to plead guilty at a hearing Friday but the judge would not allow it, according to the AP.


In January, a California judge threw out a lawsuit brought by Steinles parents, who had argued the federal government was liable for their daughters death because the gun had been reported stolen from a car used by a ranger from the U.S. Bureau of Land Management.

Aside from the fact that the stolen gun was used, there is no evidence that the shooting was in any way connected to the theft, U.S. Chief Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero wrote in his 14-page ruling.

The Friday hearing was expected to include some closed-door testimony by Zarate before Chhabria, the San Francisco Examiner reported though the reason for that portion was not clear.

The Associated Press contributed to this story.

Get all the stories you need-to-know from the most powerful name in news delivered first thing every morning to your inbox


You've successfully subscribed to this newsletter!

Read More 
Disclaimer: This story is auto-aggregated by a computer program and has not been created or edited by PaprClips.
Publisher: Fox News

Recent Articles