FTC bans noncompete agreements for many Americans but legal battle looms that would delay change
The Federal Trade Commission narrowly voted on Tuesday to ban noncompete agreements in a move that could affect up to 30 million Americans -- one out of every five workers -- in jobs ranging from executives to minimum wage earners.While the ban was celebrated by labor unions, pro-business groups have staunchly opposed it and threatened legal action.Noncompete agreements are clauses in employment contracts that bar an employee from working at a rival company, usually within a certain geographic area or for a certain amount of time.FTC Chair Lina Khan said in a statement after Tuesday's vote that the noncompete ban, first proposed last year, would "ensure Americans have the freedom to pursue a new job, start a new business, or bring a new idea to market.""Noncompete clauses keep wages low, suppress new ideas, and rob the American economy of dynamism, including from the more than 8,500 new startups that would be created a year once noncompetes are banned," Khan said.The FTC rule would take effect in 120 days.But that timeline will likely be delayed by a high-stakes legal battle.
The U.S.Chamber of Commerce told ABC News it plans to sue the FTC within the next day.The Federal Trade Commission building in Washington D.C., Jan.
28, 2015.Alex Brandon/AP, FILE"The Federal Trade Commission's decision to ban employer noncompete agreements across the economy is not only unlawful but also a blatant power grab that will undermine American businesses' ability to remain competitive," the chamber's CEO, Suzanne Clark, said in a statement.Related StoriesMan kills wife, 3 kids in mass shooting: PoliceApr 23, 12:35 PMTrump, NY AG resolve dispute over $175M bondApr 22, 12:14 PMOJ Simpson dies at 76Apr 11, 6:32 PMBut the AFL-CIO, the country's largest union organization, in a statement lauded the FTC's "strong" ban and said "[n]oncompete agreements trap workers from finding better jobs, drive down wages, and stifle competition."The FTC said the ban, should it survive court scrutiny, w...