Oral arguments suggest the Supreme Courts about to plunge into a constitutional abyss in Trump-immunity case

Writer Ray Bradbury once said, “Living at risk is jumping off the cliff and building your wings on the way down.”In Thursday’s case before the Supreme Court on the immunity of former President Donald Trump, nine justices appear to be feverishly working with feathers and glue on a plunge into a constitutional abyss.It has been almost 50 years since the high court ruled presidents have absolute immunity from civil lawsuits in Nixon v.Fitzgerald.The court held ex-President Richard Nixon had such immunity for acts taken “within the ‘outer perimeter’ of his official responsibility.”Yet in 1974’s United States v.

Nixon, the court ruled a president is not immune from a criminal subpoena.Nixon was forced to comply with a subpoena for his White House tapes in the Watergate scandal from special counsel Leon Jaworski.Since then, the court has avoided any significant ruling on the extension of immunity to a criminal case — until now.There are cliffs on both sides of this case.

If the court were to embrace special counsel Jack Smith’s arguments, a president would have no immunity from criminal charges, even for official acts taken in his presidency.It would leave a president without protection from endless charges from politically motivated prosecutors.If the court were to embrace Trump counsel’s arguments, a president would have complete immunity.It would leave a president largely unaccountable under the criminal code for any criminal acts.The first cliff is made obvious by the lower-court opinion.

While the media have largely focused on extreme examples of president-ordered assassinations and coups, the justices are clearly as concerned with the sweeping implications of the DC Circuit opinion.Chief Justice John Roberts noted the DC Circuit failed to make any “focused” analysis of the underlying acts, instead offering little more than a judicial shrug.Roberts read its statement that “a former president can be prosecuted for his official acts beca...

Read More 
PaprClips
Disclaimer: This story is auto-aggregated by a computer program and has not been created or edited by PaprClips.
Publisher: New York Post

Recent Articles