White South African refugees reveal partisan pundits true colors and theyre ugly

Media pundits are unreasonably angry about the 60 white South Africans President Donald Trump brought to the United States on Monday as refugees.They claim Trump is a hypocrite to do so after pausing other refugee programs — but that’s not the real reason they’re mad.The truth is they’re so steeped in a worldview of oppression and victimhood that it’s impossible for them to believe white people could ever be on the receiving end of racial hate.CNN pundit Ashley Allison said the Afrikaners should go back to “Germany” if they don’t like South Africa’s new law allowing its government to expropriate white owners’ land without compensation.There’s no white “genocide” in South Africa, she argued, so there’s no reason for America to offer them safe haven.NBC’s Yamiche Alcindor said violence in South Africa “is affecting everybody of every single race” — unwittingly repurposing the “all lives matter” contention heard during 2020’s “summer of love.”“The president, in my view has not hidden his racism behind a bushel,” said MSNBC’s Donna Edwards, unable to imagine white people as victims.“The Trump administration ..

.certainly is a white nationalist project,” Eddie Glaude claimed on another MSNBC panel.The leftist sages cannot envision a reality in which white people can need a refuge from political persecution.To them, only Trump’s anti-black racism can be the impetus for him to extend such aid.That’s because their oppressor/victim worldview casts everyone as either one or the other, with race as the immutable factor determining who’s who.Every white person is an evil oppressor, they believe, out to keep their perpetual victims — inherently good black or brown people — down.For those who subscribe to this moral framework, there’s no such thing as personal guilt, innocence or even agency.It doesn’t matter who is at fault; race tells the entire story.So to them, white people always take the oppressor’s r...