Review: Thrillers 'The Beast in Me' and 'Malice' offer suspense but few surprises
This is read by an automated voice.Please report any issues or inconsistencies here.
Two more horses in the crowded field of psychological thrillers have come out of the gate: “Malice,” now streaming from Prime Video, and “The Beast in Me,” on Netflix.Neither is especially surprising — “in their beginning is their end,” to switch up a line of Eliot — though they do provide some suspense and twists along the way.
They aren’t trash; quite the opposite.Each plays out like a book that constantly tempts you to skip to the end to test your impressions, but they’re classy shows with fine performances and well-written scenes.
Even in the extraordinary situations they portray, even when I didn’t buy a plot point or a development felt too convenient, I rarely felt that characters weren’t speaking as people do — or psychopaths, who are people too.“The Beast in Me” is especially good, but it’s got Claire Danes and Matthew Rhys, and there would have had to have been some serious malpractice behind the camera for it to be otherwise.Danes plays Aggie Wiggs, a writer of nonfiction whose marriage, to aspiring artist Shelley (Natalie Morales, a favorite of this department), fell apart after the death of their son in an automobile accident.
She blames a local teenager for it, and is not quiet about her wishes for him.She’s supposedly working on a book about the unlikely friendship of judges Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Antonin Scalia, but writer’s block has run out the clock on advances, and bills are piling up.
Television The leads of the Netflix miniseries talked about the intrigue their characters feel for each other, their own experiences as public figures and the possibilities of a second season.Into her constricted life comes Nile Jarvis (Rhys), a wealthy New York property developer, who has moved in next door with his wife, Nina (Brittany Snow), and a couple of big scary dogs.Aggie wants his dogs to not run over and frighten her little, not...