Judges quiz California and GOP attorneys in Prop. 50 redistricting case

This is read by an automated voice.Please report any issues or inconsistencies here.

A trio of federal judges questioned attorneys for Gov.Gavin Newsom and the California Republican Party on Wednesday in a pivotal legal case that will decide the fate of California’s new voter-approved congressional districts for the 2026 midterms elections.Attorneys for the California Republican Party and the Trump administration’s Department of Justice during the hearing recapped the argument they made in their legal complaint, accusing Democratic legislators and redistricting experts of racial gerrymandering that illegally favored Latinos.

The state’s legal representatives, meanwhile, argued their primary goal was not racial but political — they worked to weaken Republicans’ voting power in California to offset similar gerrymandering in Texas and other GOP-led states.But Wednesday was the first time the public got to hear the three federal judges of the Central District of California challenge those narratives as they weigh whether to grant the GOP’s request for a temporary injunction blocking the reconfigured congressional districts approved by voters in November under Proposition 50.The GOP has repeatedly seized on public comments from Paul Mitchell, a redistricting expert for California’s Democratic-led Legislature who designed the Proposition 50 congressional districts, that “the No.

1 thing” he started thinking about was “drawing a replacement Latino majority/minority district in the middle of Los Angeles.” On Wednesday, District Court Judge Josephine Staton suggested that GOP attorneys focused too much on the intent of Mitchell and Democratic legislators and not enough on the voters who ultimately approved Proposition 50.“Why would we not be looking at their intent?” Staton asked Michael Columbo, an attorney for California Republicans.“If the relative intent is the voters, you have nothing.”Nearly two-thirds of California voters approved th...