James Carville says Kamala Harris campaign was most ineffective $2 billion ever spent while shredding Dems 2024 autopsy

Veteran Democratic strategist James Carville and his co-host Al Hunt mocked the Democratic Party’s recent 2024 election autopsy last week, saying the reasons their party lost are glaringly obvious.A year and a half after the 2024 election, the Democratic National Committee released a whopping 192-page report purporting to explain how their party failed in keeping the presidency and in races across the country. Carville and Hunt, both of whom have warned time and time again how the Democratic Party needs to abandon its “woke” policies, criticized the report. “The supposedly much awaited Democratic autopsy on 2024 came out.To call it a total dud would be to elevate it,” Hunt said on the “Politics War Room” podcast.

“It avoided—it didn’t mention Biden’s age.It didn’t mention Gaza.

It didn’t mention Kamala Harris’s campaign problems.”While Hunt said there may be some value to studying issues like digital ad placement, he said that his ultimate takeaways were because President Biden waited too long to get out of the race and that Harris wasn’t a good candidate. “Completely agree with you,” Carville replied.“If there’s one fact about the 2024 election that you need to autopsy above all, and it’s this: From Labor Day to election day, the Harris campaign had available and spent $2 billion.

I don’t think we got a vote on election day that we weren’t going to get on Labor Day anyway.Why wouldn’t you want to know?”Carville clarified that he is not suggesting anybody skimmed money by any means, but rather he wants to know why the money was spent so ineffectively to the point it failed to reach persuadable voters.“Clearly, this was the most ineffective $2 billion ever spent.

How was it allocated? Why didn’t it do any good? Is there a way that we could have done it better? There has to be,” he said.Morning Report delivers the latest news, videos, photos and more.

Please provide ...