Dont let Big Brother control AI, Times Delaney Hall delusions and other commentary

Reason’s Elizabeth Nolan Brown contrasts the White House’s “restrained” AI vision with Sen.Bernie Sanders’ “frighteningly authoritarian vision in which the federal government gains significant control over private AI companies and the future of output.” “Fusing government priorities with private sector priorities is the whole point of Sanders’ new proposal” giving “the public a 50% ownership stake in the largest AI companies in America.” He claims “the collective is owed a cut of AI company stock,” but under his American AI Sovereign Wealth Fund Act, notes Nolan, ordinary Americans “would not have a direct role in determining the future of this technology; bureaucrats and politicians would.”As it covered Gov.

Mikie Sherrill troubles touring the Delaney Hall ICE facility, The New York Times accidentally exposed the lies of “the governor’s fellow Democrats, who also insist that they have been denied access to the facility,” notes National Review’s Noah Rothman.Except the same story notes members of Congress do have rights to inspect, but fails to note Homeland Security can restrict access for safety reasons, as “during periods in which the band of agitators encamped outside the facility engages in violence.” Of course the paper also downplayed that violence, emphasizing “a ‘festive’ atmosphere.

‘Some demonstrators bopped their heads to dance music, salsa, punk rock, rap and reggae,’ the report read.When they weren’t assaulting cops, at least.”Federal data show that “1 in 3 men were neither working nor looking for a job in April,” laments the Wall Street Journal’s Jason L.

Riley.This rise in “male joblessness doesn’t stem from an inability to find employment” but rather “from an unwillingness to search for work.” “Technological advancements and deindustrialization” are not to blame “for the increase in male idleness.” Democrats cite Europe as a “social-welfare model for the US” ye...