With Strait of Hormuz held hostage, Trumps Iran deal is worse than Obamas

As he prepared to sign his “memorandum of understanding” with the Islamic dictatorship of Iran, President Trump again insisted that his deal was much different than that of his predecessor, President Barack Obama.He’s right — it’s probably worse.Obama’s treaty did not prevent Iran from developing a nuclear weapon, it simply punted the issue down the road in exchange for cash.Trump’s agreement has the same vague promises, the same payouts, but with the added twist that Iran can and will take the world hostage by shutting the Strait of Hormuz at will.On Friday, just days after the signing of the MOU, Iran moved to close the Strait, saying no ships could cross without its permission and suggesting that “insurance fees” must be paid.This isn’t in violation of the deal.This is part of the deal.Point No.

5: “The Islamic Republic of Iran will conduct dialog with the Sultanate of Oman to define the future administration and maritime services in the Strait of Hormuz.”Why would opening the door for “administration” of a previously free international waterway even be part this agreement?How is this in any way the “unconditional surrender” Trump described?The deal contains just one condition Trump previously said was required of Iran.It’s No.

7: “Islamic Republic of Iran reaffirms that it shall not procure or develop nuclear weapons.”“Reaffirm” — because that’s what Iran has always claimed.If they suddenly mean it, it would be a win.The rest of the 14-point plan is almost entirely about what Iran gets: Immediate sanctions relief on exported oil.

Protection of Hezbollah from Israeli attack.And the possibility of a $300 billion reconstruction fund if all goes well with the next round of talks.No mention of Iran reining in its terror proxies in Gaza, Lebanon and Yemen.

No restriction on conventional weapons.Subscribe to our daily Post Opinion newsletter! Please provide a valid email.

B...