The justices ruled in favor of West Virginia and Idaho on Thursday, 6-3, against trans athletes who sued to gain access to girls' sports. ZERO BS.JUST DAKICH.
TAKE THE DON'T @ ME PODCAST ON THE ROAD.DOWNLOAD NOW!"BIG WIN: The United States Supreme Court just RULED AGAINST MEN PLAYING IN WOMEN’S SPORTS.
Wow! That takes that ridiculous situation off the table!!!" Trump posted to Truth Social.President Donald Trump waves after signing an executive order barring transgender female athletes from competing in women's or girls' sporting events, in the East Room of the White House, Wednesday, Feb.5, 2025, in Washington.
(AP Photo/Alex Brandon)As Trump celebrated the ruling, the Supreme Court said it was up to the states to make the decision on trans athletes in women's sports.Justice Sotomayor filed an opinion concurring with the judgment in part and dissenting in part, which Justices Kagan and Jackson joined.Jackson filed an opinion concurring in the judgment in part and dissenting in part.Consistent with Title IX and the Equal Protection Clause, we hold that the States may maintain women’s and girls’ sports for biological females.
They may determine eligibility for women’s and girls’ sports based on biological sex.President Donald Trump signs the No Men in Women's Sports Executive Order into law in the East Room of the White House in Washington, DC, on February 5, 2025.(ANDREW CABALLERO-REYNOLDS/AFP via Getty Images)OUTKICK IS NOW AVAILABLE ON THE FOX NEWS APP: CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOADThe states were backed by the law firm Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF), while the trans athletes were represented by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and Cooley Legal.Now, more than half of the states in the U.S.
are empowered to enforce the protection of women's sports without fear of a legal challenge.However, there are still 23 states that don't have any such laws, and some of those have laws to protect trans athletes in girls' sports.Trump signed the "No Men In Wo...