FIRST ON FOX: A top Senate Republican accused both The New York Times and high-level Senate Democrats of working together to delay publishing allegations against Maine Senate Democratic candidate Graham Platner until they could do maximum damage.Stories and allegations against Platner have been piling up for nearly a year, inflicting incremental damage to his candidacy with each report published.It started with the unearthed footage of him dancing intoxicated, sporting a tattoo of Nazi iconography on his chest last Fall, and culminated this week in a bombshell report that Platner allegedly raped his ex-girlfriend, Jenny Racicot.But it was a story from The New York Times in June that sowed deep doubts among Democrats in Washington, D.C., about his candidacy.NEW YORK TIMES UNDER SCRUTINY OVER GRAHAM PLATNER COVERAGE AS ACCUSERS SPEAK OUT AGAINST PAPERA top Senate Republican accused both The New York Times and high-level Senate Democrats of working together to delay publishing allegations against Graham Platner to the benefit of Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., and the Democratic Party.
(Aaron Schwartz/Bloomberg via Getty Images; Mario Tama/Getty Images )Sen.Tim Scott, R-S.C., who chairs Senate the Republicans’ campaign apparatus, the National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC), accused Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., and the media outlet of working together to sit on that bombshell story against Platner to buy time to replace him."We should have seen this information long ago," Scott said.
"But what they've done is they've made a decision to keep him in the race as long as possible so that they had more time to make the necessary change to try to hold onto that power and, frankly, gain power in Maine.""Whether or not Chuck Schumer wanted this candidate or not, the fact of the matter is the Democratic Party decided that this was the hill they were all willing to die on," he continued.KINGMAKER MAMDANI CALLS ON PLATNER TO 'DROP OUT OF...