FIRST ON FOX: Rep.Mary Miller, R-Ill., asked two medical university leaders in a tense hearing on Tuesday to directly answer whether non-biological women can have babies and didn’t receive a straight answer, prompting a fiery statement from the congresswoman to Fox News Digital."Doctor Hawgood, you see UCSFs Classroom Guide titled framework for Gender and Sex Concepts in Teaching, advises against using the term pregnant women," Miller said to the Chancellor of the University of California San Francisco in an Education and Workforce Committee hearing on DEI's impact in medical schools."Instead, it says to use pregnant people.
Who are pregnant people compared to pregnant women? Just curious."Hawgood responded by saying that terminology is "part of a curriculum to help our students who are facing a wide diversity of patients before saying the "vast majority of pregnancies are in women" and that he has "absolutely no problem with the term pregnant women."BILL REPLACING 'MOTHER' AND 'FATHER' WITH GENDER-NEUTRAL TERMS PASSES IN NEW YORK, HEADS TO HOCHUL'S DESKRep.Mary Miller, R-Ill., questioned medical school leaders during a House Education and Workforce Committee hearing on DEI initiatives at medical schools.
(House Education and Workforce Committee)"Has a non-biological woman ever had a baby?" Miller asked, and Hawgood responded that a "transgender person can.""That's not a biological woman.Has a non-biological woman ever had a baby?" Miller shot back.Hawgood responded, "I would reiterate" before Miller interrupted saying, "It’s ridiculous.""Lastly, Doctor Dubinett, a required course at UCLA medical school, advises ob-gyn students not to, and, I quote, assume gender identity," Miller said to Dr.
Steve Dubinett, dean of UCLA School of Medicine."Okay, from another class in May of 2026.It included a disclaimer that while it uses the term she and women, it does not intend to exclude, and I quote those who have a uterus but do not identify with these terms.
What doe...