A board-certified OBGYN is pushing back against Massachusetts’ new abortion law, arguing that third-trimester abortions are medically unnecessary and can put mothers at risk.On Monday, Massachusetts became the 10th state to allow abortions throughout pregnancy, drawing criticism from pro-life advocates and some medical professionals."If a woman's life is in danger, if she's facing a pregnancy complication beyond 24 weeks, we simply deliver her.And in fact, delivery is much more expedient than a later-in-pregnancy abortion procedure," Dr.
Christina Francis, OBGYN and CEO of the American Association of Pro-Life OBGYNs, told Fox News Digital.DEM GOV MAURA HEALEY SIGNS SWEEPING MASSACHUSETTS BILL ALLOWING ABORTIONS UP TO BIRTHMassachusetts Gov.Maura Healey turns toward supporters after signing legislation strengthening abortion protections and prioritizing access to care at the Massachusetts State House on Aug.
10, 2026, in Boston.(Jessica Rinaldi/The Boston Globe via Getty Images)Francis explained she can perform an emergency C-section in under five minutes, while an abortion later in pregnancy can take multiple days, which she said raises risks for both mother and baby.The law, signed by Democratic Gov.
Maura Healey, gives physicians broader discretion in authorizing abortions later in pregnancy while shielding them from legal penalties.Healey said the changes are meant to prevent women from having to travel out of state for abortions later in pregnancy, which she said can complicate their care.Francis criticized the law, citing concerns about the well-being of both mother and child.
"There's nothing in this law that says that at 39 weeks and five days, a woman could not have an abortion.These procedures are risky for the mom.
They lead to significant risk of complications," she said, adding that she believes scientific evidence shows fetuses can feel pain much earlier in pregnancy."The science is very clear, as early as 12 weeks of pregnancy, we know that babi...