Supreme Court to hear Missouri redistricting case for third time
The U.S.Supreme Court will hear arguments in a Missouri redistricting case for a third time after Justice Brett Kavanaugh accepted a request to intervene in the case once again Tuesday night.The divisive redistricting map drawn in 2025 would grant Republicans an additional seat in the House of Representatives if it is put in place ahead of the 2026 elections.
A federal judge in Missouri ruled in favor of the 2025 map last month, but the Supreme Court put a stay on that ruling just two weeks ago.Opponents of the map issued an emergency appeal to the Supreme Court late Tuesday night after the St.Louis-based Eighth U.S.
Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in favor of the new map on Monday.FEDERAL APPEALS COURT ORDERS MISSOURI TO USE CONGRESSIONAL MAP REJECTED TWICE BY SUPREME COURTThe maps show how Missouri’s congressional districts changed between 2022 and 2025, including the expansion of the Kansas City-area 5th District into more Republican-leaning rural parts of the state.(Missouri Office of Administration/Amanda Macias/Fox News Digital)Kavanaugh handles emergency requests for the state of Missouri and directed supporters of the new map to respond to the appeal by Wednesday at 2 p.m.
ET.The development is the latest in a rollercoaster ride of legal decisions that has seen the new map fly up and down between federal and state courts, the Supreme Court and the Missouri Supreme Court.ELECTION CHAOS IN THIS RED STATE JUST GOT EVEN STRANGER FOR REPUBLICANS AFTER SUPREME COURT RULINGThe case began when Missouri Secretary of State Denny Hoskins rejected a petition for the 2025 map to be placed on the ballot for a vote in 2026.Instead, the new map was used to determine congressional districts for the state's primary elections.People gather at the Missouri statehouse in Jefferson City on Wednesday, Sept.
10, 2025, to protest the legislature's efforts to change the state's congressional district maps.The proposed change would divide Kansas City into districts that would in...