Massachusetts Judge William Sullivan has denied Lindsay Clancy's motion for a required finding of not guilty.Sullivan had denied a similar motion when her mistrial was declared on Sept.4, and denied a renewed attempt Thursday after defense attorney Kevin Reddington argued earlier this week that Plymouth County prosecutors had failed to introduce enough evidence at trial to prove his client guilty beyond a reasonable doubt."There was evidence introduced, both physical and circumstantial, that would permit a rational trier of fact to find beyond a reasonable doubt the elements of the charge of murder," Sullivan wrote.LINDSAY CLANCY LAWYER RAISES EXPLOSIVE DOUBT OVER WHO KILLED HER CHILDRENLindsay Clancy and her attorney, Kevin Reddington, attend a status hearing for the Clancy case at the Plymouth County Superior Court in Plymouth, Massachusetts on September 29, 2026.
Clancy appeared in court for the first time since the judge declared a mistrial on September 4, after a jury was unable to reach a unanimous verdict in the high-profile case of Clancy, an American woman who killed her three young children.(Greg Derr / POOL / AFP via Getty Images)FOLLOW THE FOX TRUE CRIME TEAM ON XHe also disagreed with Reddington's argument that the state had failed to prove Clancy could have been criminally responsible for the murders.CLICK HERE FOR MORE FROM THE FOX TRUE CRIME HUBCallan, left, Dawson and Cora Clancy.
The three children were killed at their Duxbury, Massachusetts, home in January 2023.(Lindsay Marie Clancy/Facebook)GOT A TIP?"Mental illness alone does not preclude a finding of criminal responsibility beyond a reasonable doubt," Sullivan wrote.SIGN UP TO GET THE LATEST TRUE CRIME NEWSRead the judge's order:LINDSAY CLANCY'S ATTORNEY ASKS JUDGE TO ACQUIT HER OUTRIGHT, ENDING CASE AND BARRING A RETRIAL"The Commonwealth's theory of criminal responsibility was that when the defendant committed the crime, she did not lack substantial capacity to appreciate the criminality o...