The Democratic Party and its U.S.Senate candidate in Alaska owe voters the truth.
Not the denials Mary Peltola’s campaign keeps repeating, but the truth the New York Times documented this week.The Times reported that Peltola campaign aides and DSCC staffers worked to recruit additional candidates—including a man named Daniel J.Sullivan—to run and peel votes away from incumbent Republican Sen.
Dan Sullivan under ranked-choice voting.Drawing on texts, documents, and interviews, the paper reported that Peltola was "definitely aware" of the effort to seek out other people with the same name.The campaign and the DSCC denied involvement in the sham.
But notably, none of the parties accused condemned it.MARY PELTOLA'S CAMPAIGN, DEMS BACKED COVERT SCHEME TO FIELD SPOILER CANDIDATES IN ALASKA SENATE RACE: REPORTThis is a character test for Mary Peltola.Alaskans deserve better than this kind of chicanery.
Democrats clearly think voters are too dumb to figure it out.Nobody really believed Daniel J.
Sullivan’s name ended up on the ballot organically.But now the Times has provided compelling evidence.Peltola needs to come clean.
If she wasn’t involved, then she needs to have the political guts to call this out.SEN DAN SULLIVAN BRANDS PELTOLA’S ALLEGED BALLOT SCHEME A ‘SCANDAL AT THE HIGHEST ORDER’On the other hand, if the allegations are true, imagine what she might be willing to do once voters give her power.Someone who greenlights a namesake spoiler operation like this one, then denies it, demonstrates a lack of integrity and judgment that Alaskans should not expect from their U.S.
senator.Instead of making a compelling case for Mary Peltola to represent the state, the campaign and its Democratic allies relied on lies and dirty tricks.These were disgusting, sleazy dirty tricks intended to cajole, manipulate, and snooker voters instead of winning on the merits.The denials make it even worse.
All accused parties took that position in public and in the con...