It’s worth taking a closer look at President Trump’s diatribe against The New York Times.The story by reporter Neil MacFarquhar is not unlike 500 other stories you’ve read, making the same point: What did the so-called "deal" with Iran–running a page and a half – actually accomplish compared to Trump’s original goals for the war?"Neither the war nor the agreement ended what U.S.and Israeli officials regard as the main threats emanating from Iran.
The country’s nuclear program, while heavily damaged, was not eliminated — its fate punted to future negotiation."RELATED: REPUBLICANS BREAK WITH TRUMP TO REBUKE IRAN WAR — BUT IT WON'T CHANGE POLICYA composite image shows President Donald Trump alongside an Iranian flag and a missile launch. (Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)"I think it’s better that it go to American farmers than the Iranian terrorist regime," said conservative Fox News contributor Marc Thiessen, who has a personal relationship with Trump but has broken with him on this issue.Hell, Republican senators are saying this out loud. They are especially steamed that not only does Trump plan to unfreeze $300 billion in Iranian assets, he has just waived oil sanctions on the Iranians for 60 days, enabling them to earn about $10 billion by selling oil on the open market.By the way, while JD Vance has claimed a breakthrough in nuclear discussions, Iran flatly denies this, a foreign ministry spokesperson saying the theocratic dictatorship has made "no new commitments" involving nuclear inspections.What this underscores is that for all the hatred expressed for the Times, he actually craves its approval.It’s the paper he read growing up in Queens and building towers in Manhattan.The president – who is again threatening to wipe out Iran if the country misbehaves – balked at the Times headline reporting that "What Changed After Almost Four Months of War? Analysts Say Not Much." Not much?"Their Military is DONE, their Navy is GONE, their Air For...