Exclusive | I got a boob job from a dead persons fat and it ruined my breasts forever

The thought of pumping her breasts full of a dead person’s fat didn’t give Nicole goosebumps.Neither did she flinch at the $10,000 cost of AlloClae, a trendy non-surgical route to breast enhancement that uses “ethically sourced” cadaver filler.

The slight, 40-something Californian, who spoke to The Post on the condition that her privacy be protected, was eager for the fast, knife-free silhouette of her dreams.She’d previously spent almost $20,000 on two unsuccessful fat-grafting procedures, transferring what little chub she had into her barely-there bust, hoping to go up one cup size.Instead, she got breasts full of rock-like, inoperable bumps and oil cysts, causing her chest to feel like “the surface of the moon.”“I lay down in bed each night and touch the lumps, the pebbles,” said Nicole of the off-the-shelf fat that’s turned her life into a nightmare.Nicole isn’t alone in her skepticism of the trendy treatment.

AlloClae, billed as the first use of structural adipose tissue from dead donors for aesthetic body procedures, centers a legal dispute between the New York State Department of Health and its manufacturer, medical technology imprint, Tiger Aesthetics.The company recently sued the DOH, alleging the “unlawful and arbitrary” denial of distribution licenses.String back, the DOH, which regulates all tissue use and banking across the state, accused Tiger Aesthetics of “smuggling” AlloClae into New York via unsavory means, per court documents.

The case is ongoing.Nicole’s experience with the injectable is entirely unrelated to the lawsuit.But she is in favor of any extensive probe into the suspect shot that’s likely left her permanently damaged.“When I first saw a plastic surgeon’s Instagram post about AlloClae, it sounded like a miracle,” she said.

“Now, I regret ever getting it.”The chorus of remorse is growing online, as buyers bemoan their experiences.“Money not well spent,” one anonymous social media user wa...