Data centers may be the sleeper issue of the midterm elections.Fox News reported that Senate candidates are confronting growing voter anger over the electricity costs, water consumption, and sprawling developments associated with artificial intelligence.One recent Gallup survey found that 70 percent of Americans oppose the construction of new AI data centers in their own communities.Politicians are paying attention.
Some are calling for moratoriums.Others are targeting tax incentives or demanding that projects generate their own power.
The political temptation is obvious: When voters are worried about higher utility bills and rapid changes in their communities, blaming large technology companies is easier than explaining a complicated energy and infrastructure problem.ANXIETY GROWS OVER EMERGING ELECTION ISSUE, BUT GOP SAYS WASHINGTON ISN'T THE ANSWERThe concerns are real.They should not be dismissed by industry, and they cannot be ignored by elected officials.
No family should be forced to subsidize the grid upgrades required by one of the world’s wealthiest companies.Communities deserve honest answers about water use, noise, land, electricity demand, tax incentives, and who will pay for new infrastructure.But, legitimate concerns are quickly hardening into something far more dangerous: a political campaign against the physical infrastructure of American artificial intelligence.If that happens, we will repeat one of the most damaging patterns in modern American history.For decades, the United States surrendered factories, critical supply chains, mineral production, and industrial capacity to foreign competitors.
Communities lost jobs, our national security became dependent on adversaries, and Washington eventually spent billions trying to rebuild industries that should never have left.THE AI REVOLUTION COULD BECOME A NATIONAL SECURITY DISASTER IF WE AREN'T CAREFULWe cannot make the same mistake with AI.Artificial intelligence does not exist somewhere in the c...