Editor's note: This op-ed is part of a series by Eli Steele exploring White guilt in America and the West.Steele is the director of the newly released documentary essay, "White Guilt." See the film at WhiteGuiltFilm.com.I am a native Californian, and I will never get over the absurdity of seeing California and slavery in the same sentence.
I believe I saw it for the first time during the height of the Black Lives Matter unrest.I remembered how I learned in my San Jose elementary school that California entered the Union in 1850 as a free state.
Yet here we are again, this time with AB 2599, the Truth in Disclosure Act.On September 30, Gov.Gavin Newsom signed the act into law.
"This is a bill that requires large companies that operated before 1965 to search their records for ties to slavery going back to 1849 and then we make it public," Newsom said."These are insurance policies on enslaved people.
Human beings used as collateral, quite literally as collateral for loans."REPARATIONS ACTIVISTS CELEBRATE 'IMPORTANT VICTORY' AFTER NEWSOM SIGNS FIRST-EVER CORPORATE SLAVERY BILLI first learned about these atrocities as a child, and they made me understand how total the dehumanization of slavery was.This history should be learned, but there is something profoundly different about turning history into a legal obligation, sworn under penalty of perjury.
This comes at a time when most California students, including Black students, are underperforming in reading and math.So why does Sacramento want to excavate corporate records from 1849 rather than fix the classrooms today?California Gov.
Gavin Newsom bought his own racial innocence by signing into law the demand that more Black victimization be found.Imagine if Newsom had refused to sign.
He would have been blasted as the governor who protected the companies that exploited slaves. (Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)I believe the point of this investigation is not to discover more history, since we have historians for that...